Over 70 New York Auctions End Tomorrow 10/22 - Bid Now
Over 1950 Total Lots Up For Auction at Four Locations - NY 10/25, OK 10/27, TX 10/28, CA 10/29

ASTRO “decepcionou” por guidelines da seleção de USPSTF PSA

por Brendon Nafziger, DOTmed News Associate Editor | May 25, 2012
The American Society for Radiation Oncology said it was "disappointed" by a U.S. Preventive Services Task Force panel's recommendation that healthy men avoid prostate-specific antigen screenings for prostate cancer, saying a "blanket no-testing policy" was wrong and that the decision to screen should be left to doctors and their patients.

"ASTRO acknowledges that PSA screening isn't a perfect method of detecting prostate cancer," the group, the world's largest radiation oncologist society, said in a statement Thursday. "However, many patients' lives are saved by catching their prostate cancer early, and over the last 30 years we have achieved a 30 percent decline in the death rate from prostate cancer due in part to better screening."

In final recommendations released earlier this week, USPSTF said PSA screenings did more harm than good because they had a high false positive rate and also led to the possibly needless treatment of slow-growing cancers. According to the group, evidence suggests nearly 1,000 men would need to be screened to save one life, although many more would suffer complications from biopsies or interventions.

New & Refurbished C-Arm Systems. Call 702.384.0085 Today!

Quest Imaging Solutions provides all major brands of surgical c-arms (new and refurbished) and carries a large inventory for purchase or rent. With over 20 years in the medical equipment business we can help you fulfill your equipment needs

ASTRO, which represents about 10,000 radiation oncologists, isn't the first group to come out against it. The ruling was slammed by the American Urological Association, the country's biggest urologist society.
(1)

(1)

Ambrish Gupta

PSA screenings

May 28, 2012 11:09

Would we like to test the recommendation in court?

I believe the Task Force members should be personally liable for malpractice.

Any other thoughts?

Log inor Register

to rate and post a comment

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment