Over 950 Cleansweep Auctions End Tomorrow 05/02 - Bid Now
Over 800 Total Lots Up For Auction at Four Locations - TX 05/03, TX 05/06, NJ 05/08, WA 05/09

FDA panel: Add retention warning to gadolinium contrast agents

by Thomas Dworetzky, Contributing Reporter | September 11, 2017
MRI Risk Management
The gadolinium safety debate took another turn Friday, when the FDA's Medical Imaging Drugs Advisory Committee (MIDAC) voted to recommend revisions to the prescribing information for MR contrast agents with the material.

The vote was to add a warning that gadolinium can be retained in some organs and tissues.

According to a response to the meeting by Guerbet, “There are two kinds of gadolinium based contrast agents [GBCAs], linear and macrocyclic. Although there are many similarities amongst these agents, they differ in their kinetic and thermodynamic stability. Linear GBCAs are generally less stable, and for this reason, more likely than macrocyclic agents to deposit gadolinium in tissue. Guerbet's GBCA, Dotarem [gadoterate meglumine] is a macrocyclic agent. The advisory would also state the risk of retention is slightly greater with linear agents versus macrocyclic ones.”
stats
DOTmed text ad

New Fully Configured 80-slice CT in 2 weeks with Software Upgrades for Life

For those who need to move fast and expand clinical capabilities -- and would love new equipment -- the uCT 550 Advance offers a new fully configured 80-slice CT in up to 2 weeks with routine maintenance and parts and Software Upgrades for Life™ included.

stats
At the meeting, 13 committee members voted in favor of the proposal. "It was appropriate to state that there may be differences among these agents that need to be explored," said one, Dr. Michael Weisman, a professor of medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, adding that, "It's also appropriate to state that risk strategies need to be looked at more carefully. There are populations that need to be addressed, such as those that may overutilize this type of contrast imaging."

The strongest – and only – dissenting vote came from Alicia Toledano, who is president of Biostatistics Consulting in Kensington, MD. She felt it did not go far enough.

"It is hard to dismiss an anecdotal report when you are the anecdote. A life ruined is a life ruined," she said. "What does a patient do when doctors and everyone she or he turns to for help 'pooh-poohs' his or her concerns and does not order a simple urine test? When a patient finally gets tested and is found to have gadolinium retention, there is no FDA-approved antidote. What does that patient do?"

She called the proposal “insufficient.”



The group was also unanimous at 15-0 in its vote requiring the agency to have contrast manufacturers do more studies to see if more regulation is necessary.

The group argued that more information is vital.

"It's clear we need more information," stated Dr. Peter Herscovitch, acting MIDAC chair and director of the PET department at the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment