Canon, Toshiba each hit with $2.5 million fine over acquisition deal

Huge Two-Day Clean Sweep Auction July 24-25th. Click Here to Bid!

advertisement
Posição atual:
>
> This Story

starstarstarstarstar (1)
Início de uma sessão ou Registo to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment
advertisement

 

advertisement

 

Business Affairs Homepage

With stock value up 51 percent, is Mindray too pricey? Valuation has recently soared to $29 billion

Some medical devices exempted from China tariffs Among the recently announced, 110 exemptions

Noritsu acquires R&F Imaging Systems Expands R&F presence from regional to national scale

Consumer experience is top priority for 69 percent of US hospitals: survey Trend reflects growing patient burden in paying for services

Canon hit with $32 million fine by EU for Toshiba deal Used tactic dubbed 'warehousing' to get around filing requirements

Getting to 'yes' in enterprise imaging Tackling common problems on the road to more efficient radiology at SIIM

Bracco Imaging to acquire Blue Earth Diagnostics for $450 million Will gain rights over Axumin

IBM to pay $14.8 million to settle Maryland false claims allegations Settlement revolved around the 2011 acquisition by IBM of Cúram Software

Change Healthcare's IPO now heading beyond $1 billion Offering 49 million shares at $19 each

Silicon Valley investor paints dire picture for future of radiologists Claims they should no longer exist in a decade

At RSNA 2017 Canon and Toshiba
exhibited side by side

Canon, Toshiba each hit with $2.5 million fine over acquisition deal

por Thomas Dworetzky , Contributing Reporter
More fallout from the controversial $6.1 billion Canon-Toshiba deal.

The two companies have agreed to pay $2.5 million each to settle federal charges that they violated premerger notification and waiting period requirements of the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Act with the unusual nature of the 2016 transaction in which Canon acquired Toshiba Medical Systems (TMSC).

Story Continues Below Advertisement

THE (LEADER) IN MEDICAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY SINCE 1982. SALES-SERVICE-REPAIR

Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.



“The prior notice provisions of the HSR Act are designed to allow the agencies to analyze a proposed transaction before it is consummated to determine whether it will harm competition,” Bruce Hoffman, Director of the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition, said in a DOJ statement about the agreement, noting that, “deliberately structuring a transaction to avoid or delay HSR filing undermines the efficacy of the premerger notification process, regardless of whether the parties’ motives for doing so in a particular case were anticompetitive. We will be vigilant in seeking relief against attempts to circumvent the HSR Act’s filing requirements.”

The complaint and proposed final judgment have been filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and now await, after a 60-day public comment period, final court approval.

The settlement also requires that the companies put in place HSR compliance programs and agree to inspection and reporting requirements.

In the complaint, DOJ alleged that the two firms “devised a scheme to avoid” waiting period requirements and that the arrangement “had no purpose” beyond enabling the deal to close before March 31, 2016.

“Canon and Toshiba structured their transaction for the purpose of avoiding the HSR Act’s requirements,” noted Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “An acquiring person may not enlist a third party to make an acquisition on its behalf to evade the HSR Act.”

The DOJ complaint alleged that the impetus behind the maneuverings stemmed from “long-running financial irregularities at Toshiba,” which exploded into public view in 2015, and that these revelations, in turn, necessitated that Toshiba “shore up its financial statement,” which it had to do by recognizing the sale proceeds from the deal “by the end of its 2015 fiscal year on March 31, 2016.”

The complaint further claimed that both companies, by their “own admission,” acknowledged the problem. “It simply was not possible to complete a significant acquisition of TMSC voting securities before the end of Toshiba’s fiscal year due to the review periods under various merger control laws.”
  Pages: 1 - 2 >>

Business Affairs Homepage


You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment