PACS and opinions: What to consider when upgrading a PACS
Posição atual:
> This Story

starstarstarstarstar (1)
Início de uma sessão ou Registo to rate this News Story
Forward Printable StoryPrint Comment




More Magazine Features

A look back at the remarkable career of Ed Sloan Sr. Celebrating the life and career of the original parts vendor

The value of ISOs in an era of personalization and consolidation The unique value proposition of high quality third-party service

What to look for in an OEM service contract Communication the unique needs of your facility is key to getting the right coverage

The road ahead for breast density awareness It's been a good year for advocacy, here's what happens next

OB/GYN ultrasound: is the field ready to adopt new technology in the market? What do new capabilities mean for creatures of habit?

See All Magazine Features  

Health IT Homepage

Mercy Technology Services launches real-world evidence network nationwide Source of data for clinical and business-making decisions

Is Apple health team seeing some discontent? CNBC reports high rate of departures and 'tension' among members

Data sharing 'insufficient' for close to a third of healthcare providers Survey finds many switching to single, integrated EHRs to be interoperable

PHDA and Amazon Web Services team up in machine learning healthcare sponsorship Aiming to enhance medical imaging, precision medicine and cancer diagnostics

Actively regulated EHR standards are driving demand for outsourcing critical functionality Staying ahead of the curve as SCRIPT17 deadline approaches

Patient record breaches in 2019 already double the total from last year Report finds almost 32 million patient record breaches, compared to 15 million in 2018

Kaiser Permanente team standardizes definition of complete imaging history Developed prompts to help in order entry process

Everyone’s part in the perfect EMR Tips for optimizing your facility's approach to patient data

Browser beware: Study uncovers data leaks that could impact health IT Chrome and Firefox extensions may cause vulnerability

Getting physicians to embrace telehealth By 2025 the U.S. telemedicine market is expected to exceed $64 billion

PACS and opinions: What to consider when upgrading a PACS

por Lisa Chamoff , Contributing Reporter
From the January/February issue of DOTmed HealthCare Business News magazine

Years ago, hospitals upgrading to a new PACS and archiving system had some fairly straightforward decisions to make. Purchasers – for the most part, just the radiology department – considered things like workflow, support and service and, of course, price.

These days, with the rapid increase in hospital mergers, a focus on the EHR, a shift toward enterprise imaging and a look ahead to the promise of artificial intelligence (AI), providers have much more to consider than they did just five years ago.

Story Continues Below Advertisement


Special-Pricing Available on Medical Displays, Patient Monitors, Recorders, Printers, Media, Ultrasound Machines, and Cameras.This includes Top Brands such as SONY, BARCO, NDS, NEC, LG, EDAN, EIZO, ELO, FSN, PANASONIC, MITSUBISHI, OLYMPUS, & WIDE.

Dr. Rasu Shrestha, chief innovation officer at University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, noted that 2020 was always thought of as “the future” and “the future is here.”

Providers need to think about the strategy around imaging from an enterprise imaging perspective, looking at imaging “as an asset and enabler of strategies throughout the health system,” Shrestha said.

As a result, radiology departments today rarely make this decision alone.

“Decision-making has gone to the C-suite, but it's important for radiology to have a seat at the table,” Shrestha said.

Learning to share
“Ten to 15 years ago, an organization would be looking for a PACS that met their own needs,” said Don Dennison, a consultant who specializes in imaging informatics. “The most common pattern now is a shared system where multiple organizations use a single instance of PACS.”

Four years ago, after Mount Sinai Medical Center merged with Continuum Health Partners, the system went through the process of switching PACS vendors. Continuum had a system from McKesson Radiology while Mount Sinai used one from GE Healthcare, which was ultimately awarded the new contract for the merged systems.

While the Continuum radiologists needed to get used to the new system, with its new user interface, it was important to move to one, said Dr. David Mendelson, associate chief medical information officer for the Mount Sinai Doctors Faculty Practice and the vice chair of radiology IT of the Mount Sinai Health System.

“In this age of mergers, harmonization is an important principle because it’s not feasible to support numerous different systems,” Mendelson said.

Each organization may have a range of services, from trauma to general radiology, that have different requirements in terms of workflow.

The PACS and vendor-neutral archive also need to be capable of handling multiple patient IDs, a change from when more hospitals were independent.

That leads to the question of whether to upgrade to an enterprise PACS – a system shared among multiple facilities and specialties, including cardiology, neurology, ophthalmology and even dermatology – a vendor-neutral archive, or both.
  Pages: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - ... >>

Health IT Homepage

You Must Be Logged In To Post A Comment